<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10 things you should know about Myngle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.myngle.com/blog/2010/01/05/10-things-you-should-know-about-myngle/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.myngle.com/blog/2010/01/05/10-things-you-should-know-about-myngle</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 10:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ChinaMike</title>
		<link>http://www.myngle.com/blog/2010/01/05/10-things-you-should-know-about-myngle/comment-page-1#comment-5322</link>
		<dc:creator>ChinaMike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 03:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myngle.com/blog/?p=2851#comment-5322</guid>
		<description>As I am a private tutor, I naturally like to tout the benefits of tutorials however your claim that it is, "much faster and effective learning than any other method" is misleading and I suspect inaccurate.

First, is tutoring really a "method"? I don't think so. Second, could you please document your sources when you call tutoring faster than any other "method". I am really at a loss to know what you are comparing here. Is it tutoring with the "communicative method" or is it tutoring against large classes?

Furthermore in point 6 you confuse learning and teaching. It is a common error. Please don't assume that a few hours of teacher training and a nice looking resume has the effect of producing "quality learning". Teaching and learning need to be evaluated independently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I am a private tutor, I naturally like to tout the benefits of tutorials however your claim that it is, &#8220;much faster and effective learning than any other method&#8221; is misleading and I suspect inaccurate.</p>
<p>First, is tutoring really a &#8220;method&#8221;? I don&#8217;t think so. Second, could you please document your sources when you call tutoring faster than any other &#8220;method&#8221;. I am really at a loss to know what you are comparing here. Is it tutoring with the &#8220;communicative method&#8221; or is it tutoring against large classes?</p>
<p>Furthermore in point 6 you confuse learning and teaching. It is a common error. Please don&#8217;t assume that a few hours of teacher training and a nice looking resume has the effect of producing &#8220;quality learning&#8221;. Teaching and learning need to be evaluated independently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

